I support death penalty because of several reasons.

A person, who stole bread from a grocery store, definitely does not deserve death penalty.

To begin with, punishment is an act that involves intentional infliction of agony or misery to a person for wrong doing, with the aim of correction....

Whatever side of the debate we all sit on ­– whether you see it as an abasement of all civilized human values or as a necessary evil in an increasingly evil society – it’s obvious that it’s not a clear-cut issue and that if it isn’t 100% clear, we have no right to so readily take the lives of other human beings.

America is only a secondary object in the system of British politics, England consults the good of country, no farther than it answers her purpose. Wherefore, her own interest leads her to suppress the growth of in every case which doth not promote her advantage, or in the least interferes with it. A pretty state we should soon be in under such a second-hand government, considering what has happened! Men do not change from enemies to friends by the alteration of a name: And in order to shew that reconciliation is a dangerous doctrine, I affirm, in order that HE MAY ACCOMPLISH BY CRAFT AND SUBTILITY, IN THE LONG RUN, WHAT HE CANNOT DO BY FORCE AND VIOLENCE IN THE SHORT ONE. Reconciliation and ruin are nearly related.

Death penalty should continue in order to eliminate the garbage of our society.

its not uncertainty its the lawyers that choose to prolong the case so they can make money, if there are changes made to the appeal process C P will cost a lot less

Capital punishment will always have its pros and cons.

I don't argue that minorities may very well recieve a death sentence more often, but that does not require we discontinue it, merely equalize the judgments for all felons, regardless of race or gender.


There are opponents who absolutely disagree with capital punishment.

- Research Papers question the reasons why there are few women that receive death penalty.

Compassion for the victims of violent crime is paramount in all views on the death penalty, whether for or against it. A cursory glance at the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s comprehensive web site revealing the actual crimes for which many of the residents of Death Row have been convicted makes for pretty gruesome reading. The most “bleeding heart” liberal could not argue with the litany of heinous crimes scrupulously recorded there. These people, if guilty of their crimes, undoubtedly should be punished. But should they be put to death? Because are they all guilty? In the last twenty-five years, 102 condemned prisoners were released from Death Row in the U.S. because they were discovered to be innocent. (A few due to the advent of DNA, but mostly they were victims of dishonest witnesses.)

He should receive the death penalty.

As of writing, the most recent U.S. survey (Gallup, May 2002) shows that 52% approve of the death penalty as opposed to 43% who favor “life without parole.” The “for” figure has grown steadily since an all time low in 1965, with a high in recent years of 61% (1997). When the question is asked without an alternative of life sentence, the figure in favor is a good deal higher.

Arguments for and against capital punishment

There are literally thousands of anti-death penalty web sites on the internet as patently pointed out by one of the few pro-death penalty sites.

There is a strong argument here for making murder committed in these circumstances not punishable by death or for ..

FET SYSTEM is also providing essays for these topics. So just write your e-mail addresss on the comment box below and we will send the essays on you e-mail address for free.

Against the Death Penalty ..

This is not inflaming or exaggerating matters, but trying them by those feelings and affections which nature justifies, and without which, we should be incapable of discharging the social duties of life, or enjoying the felicities of it. I mean not to exhibit horror for the purpose of provoking revenge, but to awaken us from fatal and unmanly slumbers, that we may pursue determinately some fixed object. It is not in the power of Britain or of Europe to conquer America, if she do not conquer herself by and The present winter is worth an age if rightly employed, but if lost or neglected, the whole continent will partake of the misfortune; and there is no punishment which that man will not deserve, be he who, or what, or where he will, that may be the means of sacrificing a season so precious and useful.

Argument against death penalty essay | Sheridan …

Nevertheless, our film is not a political diatribe. It is a story about people who would go to great extremes because of their beliefs, and to that end the film is biased on their behalf. However, I most certainly hope that the film will provoke debate. Here is my personal understanding of the “for” and “against” arguments with regard to the death penalty.

Argument against death penalty essay

It is repugnant to reason, to the universal order of things to all examples from former ages, to suppose, that this continent can longer remain subject to any external power. The most sanguine in Britain does not think so. The utmost stretch of human wisdom cannot, at this time, compass a plan short of separation, which can promise the continent even a year's security. Reconciliation is a falacious dream. Nature hath deserted the connexion, and Art cannot supply her place. For, as Milton wisely expresses, "never can true reconcilement grow where wounds of deadly hate have pierced so deep."