David Foster Wallace and chess ChessBase YouTube

A Seven Point Riff on David Foster Wallace s David Markson Essay Wikipedia

PERTH, AUSTRALIA–You have to give David Foster Wallace some credit – he was better at making his fans bash themselves than any other writer of the Pynchon school. His magnum opus, Infinite Jest, is a 1000-page novel full of intestinally-shaped sentences and fine-print notes on calculus, organic chemistry and VCR programming. Normally, when a book like that comes out, people realise its purpose right away: terrorising B.A. students into meek submission. Wallace, however, found a very shrewd way to counter this by pretending that his work was really “a late-night conversation with really good friends, when the bullshit stops and the masks come off.” So instead of menacing the reader in the old Joycean way, Wallace chums it up whenever the technical stuff appears, acting like he really doesn’t mean to discourage anyone. Swapping lecture theatre dread for tutorial group paternalism – that’s the aesthetic in a nutshell. (And even if he IS being dense on purpose, it’s all for our own good of course.)

David Foster Wallace (February 21, 1962 – September 12, 2008) was an American author of novels, essays and short-stories, and a professor at Pomona College in Claremont, California. He was known for his 1996 novel , which included in its All-Time 100 Greatest Novels list (covering the period 1923-2006).

David Foster Wallace wrote about tennis because life gave it to him—he had played the game well at the junior level—and because he was a writer who in his own way made use of wilder days, turning relentlessly in his work to the stuff of his own experience. But the fact of the game in his biography came before any thought of its use as material. At least I assume that’s the case. It can be amazing how early in life some writers figure out what they are and start to see their lives as stories that can be controlled. It is perhaps not far-fetched to imagine Wallace’s noticing early on that tennis is a good sport for literary types and purposes. It draws the obsessive and brooding. It is perhaps the most isolating of games. Even boxers have a corner, but in professional tennis it is a rules violation for your coach to communicate with you beyond polite encouragement, and spectators are asked to keep silent while you play. Your opponent is far away, or, if near, is indifferently hostile. It may be as close as we come to physical chess, or a kind of chess in which the mind and body are at one in attacking essentially mathematical problems. So, a good game not just for writers but for philosophers, too. The perfect game for Wallace.

thanks for stating what needed to be said about david foster wallace.

Discipleship training david foster wallace crusoe essay resources for those thesis on leadership and change management looking to grow in Christ List of English writers lists cry the beloved country apartheid essay writers in English, born or raised in England (or who lived in England for a lengthy period), who already have Wikipedia pages This is a list of Canadian literary figures, including poets, novelists, children's writers, essayists, and scholars.

25 Great Articles and Essays by David Foster Wallace

The McSweeneyite clique that nurtured David Foster Wallace is slightly less mass-market than Frey and Ellis, but still a hive of bland, wholesome crypto-cons. Dave Eggers, the nucleus of the group, is pretty much the Bono of literature – a sneering, leathery vampire utterly dependent on the plasma of African children to survive. He began his career by dragging his kid-brother (now long-forgotten) around for sympathy. Then, once little Toph was too pubescent to make a good prop, Eggers dumped him for an ex-soulja-boy from Sudan. Who rarely gets mentioned, though, is his older brother William, an equally ghoulish-looking neocon who was once Director of Government Reform at the Koch brothers’ free-market Reason Foundation. He is also a fellow at the Manhattan Institute, an ultra-right Republican think-tank whose other members have included Charles Murray, author of an infamous book (The Bell Curve) arguing that blacks are intellectually inferior to whites.

25 Great Articles and Essays by David Foster Wallace ..

Moat of this article isn’t even ABOUT David Foster Wallace… I noticed someone else commented:

It’s not as good as a Dolan takedown, of course, but nobody’s as talented as Dolan. Bottom line here is that David Foster Wallace was a pretentious fraud, and Ramon Glazov is a good prospect. The Wikileaks piece was especially well done. I look forward to reading more from Ramon.

David Foster Wallace - Wikipedia

I can’t believe that no one has called out Ramon Glazov for blasting David Foster Wallace and Infinite Jest itself on grounds of “paternalism,” yet.


Wallace, David Foster - Consider the Lobster & Other Essays ..

I read Infinite Jest the year it came out, before I had ever heard of David Foster Wallace, and had no idea that it was something of an “event”. It was, and remains, the single most enjoyable book I have ever read. It is pure fun from cover to cover. There is nothing particularly difficult to understand in the book; comparing it to Pynchon or Joyce is just strange.

then, David Foster Wallace’s use of fractals was a kind of ..

I’ve never read a word of David Foster Wallace, but I read every single word of this critique because there’s nothing I enjoy more than tearing down hipster idols.

Consider the Lobster And Other Essays by David Foster Wallace …

On AA all I can say (not having ever been a member) is that it is highly anti-intellectual; members are forced to believe that they are powerless against booze, and that their only survival lies in going to those meetings every week. The State loves AA because it is free, which is why you see AA in prisons, halfway houses, any warehouse for this society’s “garbage.” Alcoholics Anonymous has a 5-percent success rate while the anti-booze drugs have a 100-percent success rate (as long as the alcoholic keeps taking them, that is.) The only reason AA survives is that there are too many powerful people who have been through it, and they think it works. David Foster Wallace was not one of those people; he was an artist who mixed AA propaganda with his writing, so he was a sucker trying to pull a con on the “literary” public.

so glad that David Foster Wallace got to live ..

Just to prove how easy it is to make the most banal, hillbilly logic sound all educated-like, I’m going to give the David Foster Wallace treatment to the mind-blowing philosophy of Dog the Bounty Hunter. You know how he always pretends the druggie whose trailer he’s besieging is the most dangerous man in Honolulu? And how it always turns out to be a mild, courteous Samoan-attorney type? And how, once the guy’s in handcuffs, Dog forces him to listen to the moral of the episode? Well let’s see how Dog’s Final Thoughts translate into Jest-speak.