This inequality is growing across the world and within countries.

His argument rests on the assumption of ten flatteners and a triple convergence.

There are nice Jews, there are evil Jews. There are loyal Jews, there are disloyal Jews. Their are rich Jews, there are poor Jews.
Like any other people.

The problem with the accusers of failed empires is this: Their empires fail because instead of collectively repenting to G’d for their apathy, greed, lust, selfishness & apostasy…..they blame the Jews.

Its interesting to note that it IS Anglicans that have totally destroyed Europe: But, do you see ANYONE pointing to their apostate Christianity? Do you see people saying: THOSE DAMED Christians?
Nope.
Jews, and ONLY Jews get blamed for just being…………Jews.

This means that the sliding majority of investments are domestically based.

However the hot times were created and sustained, Earth’s life reveled in the conditions. Similar to reptiles' beating the heat and migrating into the oceans, some mammals did the same thing about 200 million years later, and . Scientists were surprised when molecular studies found that with , and the is the closest living relative to whales. Whales evolved in and near India, beginning about 50 mya, when the earliest “whale” and lived near water. By 49 mya, . A few million years later , and by 41 mya they , for a transition from land to sea that “only” took eight million years. Whales quickly became dominant marine predators. However, sharks did not go quietly and began an arms race with whales, which culminated 28 mya in , the most fearsome marine predator ever: a shark reaching nearly 20 meters in length and weighing 50 metric tons. , as seen below ( in gray, great white shark in green, and next to that is a man taking a break in mouth). (Source: Wikimedia Commons)

The impact of board of directors and ownership characteristics on

Polar forests reappeared in the Eocene after the , and the Eocene’s was the Cenozoic’s warmest time and . Not only did alligators live near the North Pole, but the continents and oceans hosted an abundance and diversity of life that Earth may have not seen before or since. That ten million year period ended as Earth began cooling off and headed toward the current ice age, and it has been called the original Paradise Lost. One way that methane has been implicated in those hot times is that leaves have , which regulate the air they take in to obtain carbon dioxide and oxygen, needed for photosynthesis and respiration. Plants also lose water vapor through their stomata, so balancing gas input needs against water losses are key stomata functions, and it is thought that in periods of high carbon dioxide concentration, . Scientists can count stomata density in fossil leaves, which led some scientists to conclude that carbon dioxide levels were not high enough to produce the PETM, so that produced the PETM and , and the controversy and research continues.

If writing is a craft, he has all theskills, every tool.

Clive is on a familiar literary mission: he wants towrite the perfect novel.

Africa and Eurasia were another matter, as humans had been living and evolving there for around two million years, and had been hunting for . Like those Negritos and other relict humans, some animals found refugia or were lucky to live in them and did not go immediately extinct. That coastal route was only the founder group’s initial route. The were key points of settlement and radiation, where the founder group’s descendants further spread across Eurasia. There are traces of other relict human species DNA in the modern human genome, which some think might be . , which probably means that humans interbred with them as they drove them to extinction. Their contribution to today’s human genome is small, on the order of a few percent. Many thousands of years later, as Europe conquered the world, they interbred with , and there is little reason to doubt that something similar happened as that founder group’s descendants conquered Earth.

It is, rather, a poor simulacrum, a shadow of a shadow.

When the first Europeans arrived in Australia, islands off the coasts had not been inhabited for about 10 thousand years, when the oceans rose and cut them off from the mainland. On and islands, the wombats, emus, kangaroos, and other animals were so tame that people killed them with no effort whatsoever. Europeans on one island even built a hut for their wombats to sleep in at night, and they just pulled one from a hut when needed and slaughtered it. No mainland animals acted remotely like that. They are shy and furtive around people, for good reason. It did not matter if the environment was warm, dry, wet, or cold; all large animals quickly died off when humans arrived. New Guinea had a similar megafauna extinction pattern: sudden and total.


Video embedded · We all know that the Earth is not flat. Well, almost all of us. But if it were, what would happen? Would people fall off the edge when they reached the end

All continental and even most island ecosystems that humans soon invaded contained predators, but they would have been as ill-equipped to deal with the newcomers as their prey. They were capable of defending themselves, so were probably rarely hunted except by the most foolish young men. No predator on Earth would have wanted to confront fire-wielding humans with their array of weaponry and group skills. The megafauna predators went extinct when their prey did, and probably not because of much direct human violence.

What Would Happen If The Earth Were Flat? | IFLScience

The genetic testing that has been performed on humanity in the past generation has shown that the founder group’s pattern of migration was to continually spread out, and once the original settlement covered the continents, people did not move much at all, at least until Europe began conquering the world (and there were some ). There is little sign of warfare in those early days of migration, and the leading hypothesis is that people moved to the next valley rather than be close enough to fight each other. Any conflict would have been easily resolved by moving farther out, where more easily killed animals lived. Also, in those virgin continents, people need not have roamed far to obtain food. Today, an !Kung woman will carry her child more than 7,000 kilometers before the child can walk for himself/herself. If an !Kung woman bears twins, it is her duty to pick which child to murder, because she cannot afford to carry two. That demonstrates the limitations of today’s hunter-gatherer lifestyle, but in those halcyonic days of invading virgin continents (which had to be the Golden Age of the Hunter-Gatherer), those kinds of practices probably waned and bands grew fast. When they they split, and the new group moved to new lands where the animals, again, never saw people before. Unlike the case with humans, there would not have been a grapevine so that animals told their neighbors about the new super-predator. The first time that those megafauna saw humans was probably their last time. It is very likely, just as with all predators for all time, and as can be seen with historical hunting events such or , that those bands soon took to killing animals, harvesting the best parts, and moving on. To them it would not have been a “blitzkrieg,” but more like kids in candy stores. After a few thousand years of grabbing meat whenever the fancy took them, or perhaps less, those halcyonic days were over as the far coasts of Australia were reached and the easy meat was gone. When that land bridge formed to Tasmania about 43 kya, people crossed and were able to , until all the megafauna was gone on Tasmania. They also may have worked their way through the food chain, in which the first kills were the true mother lode. Nobody even deigned to raise a spear at anything less than a until they were gone. Then they started killing smaller prey, which eventually did wise up and were harder to kill, so humans had to work at it again and the brief golden age was over. The as they shaped the new continent to their liking, maybe recreating the savanna conditions that they left in Africa, may have also been used to flush out animals if they began to avoid humans.

SparkNotes Search Results: The World Is Flat

Earth had never before hosted anything like behaviorally modern humans. Nothing came close. They wielded fire and began using it for offensive purposes, to . They had sophisticated stone tools and weapons, they mastered language and could engage in group behaviors that no other land animal remotely accomplished. They probably had sophisticated projectile weapons, and if the , they may have also . One !Kung arrow can bring down a 200-kilogram antelope in less than a day. What kind of animal in the Western Hemisphere and Australia, that had never seen anything like a human before, and would have been the of the invaders, and the large ones all reproduced slowly, could have withstood that onslaught? None that I can think of. Neanderthals were ambush predators of megafauna that were wary of humans, and whatever projectile weapons they may have had, they would have been inferior to those that behaviorally modern humans left Africa with about 60-50 kya. Neanderthals still lived off of those animals, with suffered during hunts. That would have been nothing like what the invaders of the Western Hemisphere and Australia encountered. They could have walked right up to all of those animals with no conditioned fear of humans and stuck their spears into them, maybe not even needing to use projectile weapons, much less poisoned ones. That scenario has been called the , but it would not have seemed a rapid event to the invaders. It would have been a butcher shop’s version of the Garden of Eden. Farther than they could imagine, in every direction, were animals with no fear of humans that could be killed so easily that it may have literally become child’s play. One argument by human-agency skeptics is that continental animals were subject to predation and would have begun fleeing fast. That seems like a weak argument, and here is why.